Translate

Thursday, December 29, 2011


Classical music deters teenagers from shopping center


 
Classical music was originally played to create a welcoming environment for shoppers
The sound of Bach, Mozart and Beethoven has reduced anti-social behaviour outside a Birmingham shopping centre, according to police.

In November, the PA system on the ramp leading to the Pallasades on New Street was upgraded.
The aim was to pipe soothing classical music to create a welcoming environment for shoppers and commuters.

Within days, police officers and shopkeepers noticed the number of teenagers hanging around had gone down.

"Clearly, they don't like our choice of tunes”
But many of the youths returned when the system was temporarily switched off to allow for additional tracks to be uploaded.

PC Dominic McGrath, who masterminded the scheme, said: "We've been surprised by the effect the music has had on young people.

"Since the scheme went live, fewer young people are gathering on the ramp and we've seen a dip in the number of people who are asking us to move them on.

"Clearly, they don't like our choice of tunes."

The music is broadcast between 9:00 and 21:30 GMT on weekdays, and from 12:00 to 21:30 at weekends.

SAG Awards Post Card in the mail...and watch for links for special offers and viewing opportunities


Important SAG Awards Voting Information

Dear Member,

Watch your mailbox for important SAG Awards voting information!


18th Annual SAG Awards Voting Postcard

The 18th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards voting information postcard will be mailed out to eligible members tomorrow, December 30, 2011.  In order to be eligible to vote, your November 2011 dues must have been paid – and any address changes made – by December 16, 2011. 

In keeping with our commitment to green practices, the postcard you will receive next week includes details about how to vote online, which we encourage!  For those members who wish to request a paper ballot in lieu of voting online, please call (877) 610-8637 before January 16, 2012 and one will be mailed to you.  Have your SAG ID number ready when calling.
 
Please note, both the studios and the SAG Awards offices are closed December 30-January 2 and will re-open January 3, 2012. Next week, we will be finalizing any 'for your consideration' offers of SAG Award nominated films the studios will be providing.  We will post this information on our website as soon as possible at www.sagawards.org/filmoffers
www.sagawardsRSVP.org  

On January 9, we will email all eligible members details on DVD screeners, free iTunes downloads and Movie Cash coupons.  Please be patient as this information is being gathered. 

For up to the minute information on all things SAG Awards follow us on Facebook and Twitter!


The SAG Awards airs live on TNT and TBS Sunday, January 29 at 8 p.m. ET, 5 p.m. PT and a primetime encore presentation will follow at 10 p.m. ET, 7 p.m. PT!

Christians call for HBO Boycott



From the LA Times Company Town blog...click here for the latest industry news.

Bill Maher has run afoul of religious conservatives yet again, after a Christmas Eve tweet the comedian sent about overtly religious Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow. Following a 40-14 Broncos' loss to the Buffalo Bills on Saturday, Maher tweeted, "Wow, Jesus just... #TimTebow  bad! And on Xmas Eve! Somewhere in hell Satan is tebowing, saying to Hitler 'Hey, Buffalo's killing them'. (Adult language has been removed from the Tweet.)

Predictably, the dig from the atheist comedian didn't go over well with Christians. Fox Business' "Follow the Money" host Eric Bolling got things rolling with his Twitter response: "Bill Maher is disgusting vile trash. I can't even repeat what he just tweeted about Tebow..on Christmas Eve. #straighttohellBill."

Others have called for a boycott of HBO, which is the home of Maher's show, "Real Time." This wouldn't be the first time Maher's words have raised the ire of those on the opposite end of the political spectrum. There are regular calls for Maher's ouster from HBO. It happened in July, following a frank discussion of "hate sex" with Republican presidential candidates Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum. And in 2008, following comments about Pope Benedict XVI.

Will taking on Tebow be a bridge too far for Maher? Doubtful — but it is interesting to consider that the "Real Time" host wasn't just taking on an exceedingly popular quarterback; he was also mocking the best-selling religious author of 2011. According to Yahoo! Sports, Tebow's 2011 memoir "Through My Eyes" has 475,000 copies in print, with many more expected to be sold after the season.

Of course, considering Maher made a documentary critical of religion titled, "Religulous," he probably wouldn't have changed a thing.

"Real Time With Bill Maher" returns to HBO on January 13.

RELATED:
Emmys: Bill Maher expands his record losing streak
Why Bill Maher is convinced Donald Trump will run for president
On 'Tonight Show,' Bill Maher attacks NRA, Arizona and the audience

—Patrick Kevin Day
Photo: Bill Maher. Ricardo DeAratanha / Los Angeles Times

Obama: The conservative in 2012

E.J. Dionne Jr.

E.J. Dionne Jr.
Opinion Writer
Washington Post (click here)
President Obama's popularity ratings are at 47%, with almost 20% beyond that undecided. There is no mandate to toss him out of office, as being argued in Republican debates. Since Obama represents the majority views and practices of both parties going back to before Teddy Roosevelt, social programs crafted by both parties have been a core part of this country for over a century, and that progressives feel that the man conservatives label "liberal" does not go far enough...EJ Dionne argues that Obama is the only true conservative in 2012's  pack of presidential hopefuls...

At a moment when the nation wonders whether politicians can agree on anything, here is something that unites the Republican presidential candidates — and all of them with President Obama: Everyone agrees that the 2012 election will be a turning point involving one of the most momentous choices in U.S. history.

True, candidates (and columnists) regularly cast an impending election as the most important ever. Campaigning last week in Pella, Iowa, Republican Rick Santorum acknowledged as much. But he insisted that this time, the choice really was that fundamental. “The debate,” he said, “is about who we are.”


Speaking not far away, in Mount Pleasant, Newt Gingrich went even further, and was more specific. “This is the most important election since 1860,” he said, “because there’s such a dramatic difference between the best food-stamp president in history and the best paycheck candidate.” Thus did Gingrich combine historic sweep with a cheap and inaccurate attack. Nonetheless, it says a great deal that Gingrich chose to reach all the way back to the election that helped spark the Civil War.

Mitt Romney was on the same page in a speech in Bedford, N.H. “This is an election not to replace a president but to save a vision of America,” he declared. “It’s a choice between two destinies.” Sounding just like Santorum, he urged voters to ask: “Who are we as Americans, and what kind of America do we want for our children?”

Obama could not agree more. “This is not just another political debate,” the president said in his theme-setting speech in Osawatomie, Kan., earlier this month. “This is a make-or-break moment for the middle class, and for all those who are fighting to get into the middle class.”

On this one, Santorum, Gingrich, Romney and Obama all have it right. For the first time since Barry Goldwater made the effort in 1964, the Republican Party is taking a run at overturning the consensus that has governed U.S. political life since the Progressive era.

Obama is defending a tradition that sees government as an essential actor in the nation’s economy, a guarantor of fair rules of competition, a countervailing force against excessive private power, a check on the inequalities that capitalism can produce, and an instrument that can open opportunity for those born without great advantages.

Today’s Republicans cast the federal government as an oppressive force, a drag on the economy and an enemy of private initiative. Texas Gov. Rick Perry continues to promise, as he did last week during a campaign stop in Davenport, Iowa, to be a president who would make “Washington, D.C., as inconsequential in your life as he can make it.” That far-reaching word “inconsequential” implies a lot more than trims in budgets or taxes.

The GOP is engaged in a wholesale effort to redefine the government help that Americans take for granted as an effort to create a radically new, statist society. Consider Romney’s claim in his Bedford speech: “President Obama believes that government should create equal outcomes. In an entitlement society, everyone receives the same or similar rewards, regardless of education, effort and willingness to take risk. That which is earned by some is redistributed to the others. And the only people who truly enjoy any real rewards are those who do the redistributing — the government.”

Obama believes no such thing. If he did, why are so many continuing to make bundles on Wall Street? As my colleagues Greg Sargent and Paul Krugman have been insisting, Romney is saying things about the president that are flatly, grossly and shamefully untrue. But Romney’s sleight of hand is revealing: Republicans are increasingly inclined to argue that any redistribution (and Social Security, Medicare, student loans, veterans benefits and food stamps are all redistributive) is but a step down the road to some radically egalitarian dystopia.

Obama will thus be the conservative in 2012, in the truest sense of that word. He is the candidate defending the modestly redistributive and regulatory government the country has relied on since the New Deal, and that neither Ronald Reagan nor George W. Bush dismantled. The rhetoric of the 2012 Republicans suggests they want to go far beyond where Reagan or Bush ever went. And here’s the irony: By raising the stakes of 2012 so high, Republicans will be playing into Obama’s hands. The GOP might well win a referendum on the state of the economy. But if this is instead a larger-scale referendum on whether government should be “inconsequential,” Republicans will find the consequences to be very disappointing.

ejdionne@washpost.com
By E.J. Dionne Jr.
Opinion Writer
Washington Post (click here)
 

The "necessary" use of racial and sexual stereotyping in war cartoons

Judge decisions and opinions by the times in which they were thought of, made or formed.

Three cartoons below are from YouTube and are banned from television for being racist. Two were made by the US Military as training films and one is a commercial "Popeye" made to aid recruitment. The time period is World War II, when the US became a part of two world altering wars, now labeled World War II. They reflect the images, fears and priorities of the time.

How would you justify the content?
What has changed in our society?
What would be their value today in education and as entertainment?


Private SNAFU - Spies (1943) - World War II Cartoon

WWII Training Video: Private SNAFU - Booby Traps (1944) - World War II Cartoon

Course Materials for Week One

CSN Communication 101: Oral Communication

Instructor:               Art Lynch                            Phone/Voicemail: (702) 714-0740
Email:                      CSN on-line campus Angel preferred (or dr.artlynch@me.com  )                                   
Web:                        Angle link             http://www.csn.edu/pages/2212.asp,
REQUIRED TEXTBOOK: 
Coopman, S. J. & Lull, J. (2009).  Public speaking: The evolving art. With supplemental materials for the Department of Communication at CSN. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

OTHER REQUIRED MATERIALS: Scantron Forms 882e or 882es & # 2 Pencils (for exams)
Keep current on current affairs and on the subjects you choose to speak about.

COURSE DESCRIPTION: Com 101, Oral Communication, satisfies the Communication requirement for related instruction for many certificates offered at CSN.  Please check the CSN Catalog or your degree sheet to determine if COM 101 fulfills that requirement.  The emphasis of this course is upon the principles of effective communication.  We will study various communication strategies from both a practitioner's perspective as well as from the viewpoint of a recipient. 

Syllabus:
http://www.comprofessor.com/2012/01/public-speaking-syllabus-art-lynch.html 


About Instructor:




COM 101 Sections Taught Spring 2012:
http://www.comprofessor.com/2012/01/com-101-sections-taught-by-art-lynch-at.html


Readings for Week #1
Extra Credit:
http://www.comprofessor.com/2011/11/xtra-credit-for-csn-com-101-and-102.html


Other:

Conservative establishment divided against itself


Those denouncing it don't seem to realize they're apart of it.


GOP debate
Mitt Romney is seen on screen during the Iowa GOP/Fox News debate in Ames. (Charlie Neibergall / AFP/Getty Images / August 11, 2011)



I've made a disturbing discovery: I am a member of the conservative "establishment." I felt like Michael Douglas at the end of "Falling Down": "I'm the bad guy?"

For the last few years, the rank and file of the GOP and the conservative movement have become deeply disenchanted with what they see as the rubber-spined, foot-dragging quislings drinking from a trough of chablis at some Georgetown party. The term "RINO" (Republican In Name Only) has become an epithet of ideological enforcement, spit out in much the same way Mao cursed "running dog capitalists."
In 2010, the tea parties and the conservative base (not always synonymous terms) tried to cull as many RINOs from the herd as they could in the primaries. They were extremely successful, with only a few stumbles.

Things are messier this time around. And to some extent this is to be expected. Presidential primaries rely on much larger pools of voters than primaries in midterms. Moreover, rather than a single tea party candidate challenging a worn-out incumbent, the field has had lots of candidates seeking the tea party or "true conservative" mantle.

Each of them has tried to play the populist card, not just against the liberal media establishment but also against the so-called conservative establishment. "I believe it is a deliberate attempt to damage me because I am not, quote unquote, the establishment choice," explained Herman Cain when asked about his troubles.

Though he never intended any of this, Mitt Romney is largely to blame for the anti-establishment tumult. Somehow, he has managed to become the Arlen Specter of the 2012 field. (Specter is conservative-speak for "demon RINO from hell." You're supposed to spit on the ground after you say "Arlen Specter." Ptooey.)

In 2008, Romney was the conservative alternative to John McCain, earning endorsements not just from National Review magazine but from the titans of right-wing talk radio — Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham. Now Limbaugh insists that support for Romney proves that "the Republican establishment does not want a conservative getting the nomination." Erick Erickson, a CNN contributor and editor of the conservative site Red State, says that if Romney is the nominee, "Conservatism dies and Barack Obama wins."

After National Review issued a stinging anti-Newt Gingrich editorial, many of the same voices insisted that the magazine (where I work, though I didn't write the editorial) has, in the words of one right-wing blogger, lived long enough "to become the villain." Fox News, Karl Rove, Charles Krauthammer, George Will and even pro-Romney columnist Ann Coulter are routinely denounced as part of some RINO cabal.

It's difficult to catalog all of the oddities. Hugely successful, powerful and rich conservatives are lambasting the establishment as if they are in no way part of it. Gingrich has gone from being too establishment to too anti-establishment faster than you can say "Freddie Mac." And you can only wonder how befuddled Romney is given that he's moved even further rightward since 2008.

Frankly, I can't blame anyone for being underwhelmed by Romney, or begrudge anyone their frustration with the field. What's harder to understand is how nobody has noticed that the conservative establishment, which includes many of my friends denouncing it, has become vastly more conservative over the last two decades. It's more pro-life, more pro-2nd Amendment, more opposed to tax increases.

The political corpses of RINOs litter the roadside of this great migration. Rockefeller Republicans went out with 8-track tapes, leisure suits and Kevin Phillips. And yet, people talk about the conservative establishment like David Gergen is calling the shots.

The mere fact that there's something one can meaningfully describe as a conservative establishment today is a victory, never mind that it is more conservative than it has ever been. But a conservative establishment is useless if it doesn't bring the nation with it. The frustration on the right stems from the fact that none of the candidates seems up to that task.

jgoldberg@latimescolumnists.com
LA Tims Op-Ed  

Tyler Cowen - The Great Stagnation - the death of innovation

Stories and how they form who we are

Ted Cowens talk on TED is worth listening to for both communication and critical thinking students. It tells how stories form our views, our perceptions, our reality. It also points out that stories reinforce our beliefs instead of solving problems and living life. I recommend sitting through the full lecture.

Stories, Reality, and The World: Economist Tyler Cowen

On life's failures

"Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up." -Thomas Edison

Mitt Romney: I'll Put Ads On Big Bird

From the Huffington Post (click here to view video and read the full story).

WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney pledged to cut spending for public television while campaigning in Iowa on Wednesday, saying that Big Bird should be supported by advertisements and that the arts will need to get more private donations to stay afloat.

"We're not going to kill Big Bird," Romney said on Wednesday afternoon during a campaign stop in Clinton, Iowa. The former Massachusetts governor made the promise while touting his plans to drastically cut federal spending, under which he would slash $500 billion dollars a year from the budget by the end of his first term.

But while America's favorite seven-foot-tall bird would survive under Romney, he'll probably acquire some baggage. Romney stressed the need to cut even popular programs and singled out the National Endowment for the Arts and the Public Broadcasting Corporation as entities that would have to seek private funding in a Romney administration.

"Big Bird is going to have advertisements, all right?" said Romney. "And we're going to have endowments for the arts and humanities, but they're going to be paid for by private charity, not by taxpayers."

From the Huffington Post (click here to view video and read the full story). 

Music Industry Rebounds; NYT e-mail blast; Tops on Red Box; Get Ready for the Summer of Sequels


U2Bono
From the LA Times Company Town blog...click here for the latest industry news.

Concert moolah: The top-grossing music act in concert in 2011 was U2, demonstrating that it's not teenagers driving what is fast becoming the record industry's most important source of revenue as album sales head south. The Irish rockers were the only group to sell more than $100 million worth of tickets and were followed on the list by Taylor Swift, Kenny Chesney, Lady Gaga, and Bon Jovi. The Los Angeles Times has all the details.

Email oops: On Wednesday more than 8 million people who had given their email address for one reason or another to the New York Times got a note informing them they had canceled home delivery and offering a chance to renew at 50% off. First the paper said the note was spam from another company, but it soon changed the story and admitted that in fact it had sent the email in error. To me, a mistaken email is hardly a big deal, but not knowing you sent it is a little bizarre. Coverage from the New York Times and PaidContent.

Cruise's box-office boom: "Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol" has taken in $86 million at the domestic box office through Tuesday but about twice that overseas, demonstrating that Paramount has a worldwide hit on its hands with the fourth entry in its Tom Cruise action series. "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows" was the first movie to cross $100 million domestically, but that's only because it opened first. "Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked," meanwhile, is making up a bit of ground after its weak opening. Box-office details during the critical Christmas-through-New-Year's week from the Hollywood Reporter.

Red-hot on Redbox: Redbox renters across the U.S. preferred comedies in 2011, making their top choices Adam Sandler's "Just Go With It" and Ashton Kutcher's "No Strings Attached." The same was true in Los Angeles, though our top 10 contained a few movies the rest of the country wasn't as excited about, such as "Bad Teacher" and "The Social Network." The full lists and some analysis from the Los Angeles Times.

A cure for sequelitis? Summer 2012 will bring some significant bets on non-sequels at the box office, giving moviegoers a chance to prove they like original ideas after the highest grossing movies of 2011 were all follow-ups, reports the New York Times. Of course, whether "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" based on the bestselling book, is really more "original" than "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" or "The Dark Knight Rises" is a debatable point in my book.




 Put off to next year. "Twilight" studio Summit Entertainment is still deep in negotiations with two potential buyers, but won't reach an agreement with either before the end of 2011.

The Santa Monica firm remains in talks to sell itself to fellow studio Lions Gate Entertainment and private equity firm Colony Capital, a co-owner of Miramax, people familiar with the matter but not authorized to speak publicly said.

Executives at Summit had hoped to close a deal by the end of the year because of certain tax and financial advantages, two of the people said, but that has virtually no chance of happening by Saturday.
Instead, talks with both parties have slowed down during the holiday season and are expected to pick back up next week. Summit is likely still looking to close a deal as soon as possible, as it is currently in a good position with one more "Twilight" sequel yet to be released and a significant pile of cash that, one knowledgeable person said, will be distributed to investors in the event of a sale.

Both Lions Gate and Colony are said to be offering about $350 million to $400 million to acquire Summit, along with the assumption of roughly $200 million in debt.

If Lions Gate were to take control, Summit chiefs Rob Friedman and Patrick Wachsberger are expected to run the merged studio's motion picture group, sources close to the negotiations said. If Colony, which is led by billionaire investor Tom Barrack, were to be the winning bidder, Summit would likely be merged with Miramax. In that scenario, it's likely that Friedman and Wachsberger would run the combined company, possibly alongside Miramax CEO Mike Lang.

Also in the Los Angeles Times: Some recent handprint ceremonies at Grauman's Chinese Theatre were marketing stunts only and won't result in chipmunk handprints on Hollywood Boulevard. A profile of "Pariah" star Adepuro Odoye. Patrick Goldstein on "relationship movies." 


— Ben Fritz

Photo: U2's Bono in concert at the Meadowlands in New Jersey in July. Credit: Charles Sykes / Associated Press.

Where has Music Gone? Daddi Gudbergsson - We should kill more of our artists