Donate Today! Help us help others.

Lynch Coaching


Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Why I have two...and if I could would care for many more! It's unconditional love.

New York Observer: Exclusive "Occupy Wall Street" Unaired Fox Footage

RIP The Simpsons?

Don't have a cow but News Corp. may be better off without 'Simpsons'

Would News Corp. be better off if Homer Simpson retires?
On the surface that question seems absurd. After all, "The Simpsons" has been a staple of News Corp's Fox network for more than two decades and remains one of its most popular shows. Furthermore, the cartoon has pumped billions of dollars into the company's bottom line in the form of reruns and DVD sales around the globe.
But a contract dispute between the actors who provide the voices for "The Simpsons" and 20th Century Fox Television, which produces the show for the Fox network, is threatening the show's future and raising new questions about whether the economics for one of television's most famous programs still makes sense.
In a statement, 20th Century Fox Television said it "cannot produce future seasons under its current financial model." News of the dispute between the cast and producers was first reported by the Daily Beast.
The studio is seeking to cut the salaries of the cast. The cast is willing to consider that but only in exchange for a small percentage of the show's profits, which is not yet on the table. The key cast members include Dan Castellaneta (Homer), Julie Kavner (Marge), Nancy Cartwright (Bart), Yeardley Smith (Lisa) and Hank Azaria (Moe the bartender, Chief Wiggum and Apu).
"The Simpsons" is no longer the powerhouse it once was. So far this season, it has averaged 7.1 million viewers. That is a sharp drop of nearly 20% from five years ago, when "The Simpsons" averaged 8.7 million viewers. Among the coveted adults ages 18 to 49 category, "The Simpsons" ratings have fallen 17%.
To be sure, most shows experience ratings declines as they age. The conundrum is that the cost of producing shows also goes up as they get older because producers and actors tend to get big raises the longer a program remains on the air. The per-episode license fee that Fox pays its sister studio for "The Simpsons" is north of $5 million per episode, according to people with knowledge of the terms who declined to speak publicly because of the sensitivity of the situation. At that price, the show is no longer profitable for the network, these people said.
"The Simpsons" continues to generate lots of money for News Corp. through reruns and DVD sales, although not as much as it once did and there is little financial need for more episodes.
With regards to reruns, the deals for repeats of the show are very old and heavily favor the stations carrying it. Usually, TV stations pay cash plus a portion of commercial inventory (known as barter advertising) in return for getting to air reruns of popular shows. In the case of "The Simpsons," the barter advertising portion of the agreement with the stations that carry it expired years ago and now it is strictly a cash deal.
Until the show stops producing new episodes, News Corp.'s hands are tied with regards to finding new buyers that will pay more for the repeats. Once the show is done on Fox, the contracts News Corp.'s syndication unit 20th Television struck with local stations will start to expire and new rerun deals can be struck with both local stations and cable networks. Given the strength of "The Simpsons" performance in reruns, there will be no shortage of buyers. News Corp. Deputy Chairman Chase Carey has even talked about starting a cable network devoted to reruns of "The Simpsons."
"There’s only upside opportunity given the fact that the syndicator would be able to sell another cycle of the program to broadcast which would definitely include barter and also allow for a sale to cable," said Bill Carroll, a vice president at industry consulting firm Katz Television.
Although from a business standpoint a case can be made that it's time for Homer and the gang to retire, the show's creative team, which includes creator Matt Groening and executive producer James L. Brooks would like to see it last 25 years. The show just started its 23rd season.
"We are hopeful that we can reach an agreement with the voice cast that allows 'The Simpson' to go on entertaining audiences with original episodes for many years to come," the studio said in its statement.
"The Simpsons" is still a valuable platform for Fox. Its iconic characters remain the face of the network. A Sunday night without "The Simpsons" would be like a "60 Minutes" without Andy Rooney. Oh, wait a minute.

RIP Homer?

"The Simpsons" may end it run of 23 years. FOX says the business production model for the show does not fit in today's society. The network insist on a cut of 45% in production costs if they renew the show. The producers and cast respond that FOX is making bank on their share of videos, international sales, dolls, slot machines, pin ball machines and an endless list of "Simpson's" merchandising and that the program itself earns far more then its production cost over the course of the year in advertising and audience alone.

This is the second time in the show's history a budget cut ax has been threatened by FOX executives. The difference this time is that the parent company, Rupert Murdock's NewsCorp, does not depend on broadcast TV to justify its television empire.

This time the Simpons could well lose.

RIP Homer and family.

Web Interactivity and Appearance Changes

The format for this blog is from blogspot. They are making major changes that have resulted in incompatibility with some browsers (Explorer for one) and alterations in look and format. The content remains the same.

Please let this web site know of any conflicts loading, viewing or dealing with this site. Post your comments below or e-mail

How the rich do business to finance political parties

Republican billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch -- who have spent untold millions bankrolling right-wing candidates and causes -- are now the subject of a new Bloomberg investigation that shows Koch Industries profited from doing business with Iran.

This is all despite American trade sanctions against Iran and the country’s known links to financing terrorists.

House Republican Leadership’s response: Silence.