Greed? Jobs and the promise of the American Dream? Politicians taking favors from out of state (and in state developers), an unpredicted (by locals anyway) international Great Recession, a rapid shift in demographics (age, race, ethnic group and most importantly economic level), people wanting a land terraformed to look like "back home" and never considering themselves truly Nevadans?
All are true, along with the greed of cookie cutter development put up to maximize sales per acre instead of considering our desert heat, subsidence, lack of shade and even the direction of the sun itself. Urban environments in a suburban setting, and even the term "suburb" itself, were imported from east coast developments without the identity and enmities eastern communities have.
KNPR contributor, and UNLV professor Dr. Robert Fielden was one of several sources in a Las Vegas Sun tour of the scared and depressing Las Vegas Valley, where brilliance and true innovation are dwarfed and sometimes ruined by the quest for the dollar and indifference to existing structures and landscape.
Even UNLV is mentioned as having ruined what could have been an academic escape, respite and magnet for Southern Nevada. Building that open to parking lots, greatly differing architecture, desert landscaping where there should be open land for students to meet, great and play together...and the giant concrete area by the library that attracts heat and "could be a runway for McCarren."
From the Las Vegas Sun:
Boom-bust era leaves valley
with architectural scars
Architects say the Las Vegas real estate bubble had wildly distorting effects on the behavior of developers, architects, consumers and elected officials. “Everything was moving so fast, no one stopped to think about what they were doing,” Fielden says.
The mania for land and the hyperinflation of construction costs set off an economic sickness in which what seemed rational at the time, in hindsight, looks like folly.
This manifested itself in many ways.
• It seemed any project, no matter how preposterous, could make money. Thus, Vantage. Any number of condo and hotel projects on the Strip could also fit in this category.
• Rampant overbuilding. Those with land felt the need to build, and build now, and build with the highest possible density. They built with the assumption that growth in the valley — of residents, tourists, consumers — would lead to profitability. But the building continued even after the growth stopped and everyone ran out of money, both on the Strip and in the community. That has left us with the overhang that plagues the local economy.
• Foolish consumers. Investors thought they could make a quick buck, while families who merely wanted to own a home thought they had to buy now, lest they be left out in the cold. They were like people in a food line who gorged themselves on whatever the developers fed them, fearing this was the last meal, or fearing that the next meal would be unaffordable. So they ate and ate and ate, and then borrowed more money to keep eating, until they got sick.
• Elected officials, who loved the ever-growing tax revenue and the bottomless bag of campaign donations from developers, were usually quick to approve even harmful development. For instance, they allowed subdivisions with housing density to match major East Coast cities, but without any of the amenities of urban density.
Photos, and much more on this study of the architecture and scars that are "post recession" Las Vegas are in today's edition of the Sun (inside the Review Journal) and on-line (click here).
...







